Evaluation
The list of metrics in the Evaluation category critically assesses a Large Language Model's (LLM's) performance in generating responses that are accurate, relevant, and linguistically coherent to a wide array of prompts. This evaluation is pivotal in determining the model's ability to understand and respond appropriately to diverse user inputs, ranging from simple queries to complex, context-rich requests. Through a carefully curated set of prompts that encompass a broad spectrum of topics, styles, and difficulty levels, this evaluation provides a comprehensive view of the model's linguistic capabilities and its utility across various applications.
Accuracy and Relevance: Measures how well the model's responses align with the factual correctness and context-appropriateness of the prompts, ensuring the information provided is both accurate and relevant.
Linguistic Coherence: Evaluates the model's ability to produce responses that are not only grammatically correct but also logically coherent, maintaining a natural flow of ideas.
Adaptability across Domains: Assesses the model's versatility in handling prompts from different domains, indicating its breadth of knowledge and application versatility.
Quantitative Metrics: Utilizes metrics and custom scoring systems based on human evaluations, offering a quantitative basis for comparing the model's performance across different tasks and datasets.
Go through individual implementation with examples to understand a suite of use cases covered under the Evaluation Category
Last updated